Header text
Use this text to share your size guide with your customers. “稻盛和夫撒尽快回复”
This bold wedding band styled in black tungsten carbide features a textured center and beveled edges. Made from a patented formula, tungsten carbide is prized for its strength and durability. The fine jewelry ring is 8mm in width and is Supreme-Fit™ for maximum comfort. This wedding band is available in sizes for men or women.
Item #:
253411300
Typographic errors are subject to correction. Merchandise enlarged to show detail and may not always be exactly as pictured.
| Stone(s) | |
|---|---|
|
Stone Type
|
No Stone |
| Setting Only | No |
| Metal(s) | |
|---|---|
|
Metal Type
|
Tungsten |
| Metal Color | Black |
| Ring Design | |
|---|---|
| Ring Style | Wedding |
| Standard Ring Size | 10.0 |
Find your size by measuring either a string you've wrapped around your finger or by using a ring that fits. Then, use the ring size chart below to find your size.
Take a piece of non-stretchable string, ribbon, thread, or a thin strip of paper. Wrap it comfortably around your ring finger, close to the knuckle.
With a pen, carefully mark the spot where the string overlaps. For accuracy, make the marks small.
Unwrap your marked length. With a ruler, measure it in millimeters. Find your measurement below.
| Standard (US) Size | Internal Diameter | European Size |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 14.0 mm | - |
| 3.5 | 14.4 mm | 46 |
| 4 | 14.8 mm | 47 |
| 4.5 | 15.2 mm | 48 |
| 5 | 15.6 mm | 50 |
| 5.5 | 16.0 mm | 51 |
| 6 | 16.45 mm | 52 |
| 6.5 | 16.9 mm | 53 |
| 7 | 17.3 mm | 54 |
| 7.5 | 17.7 mm | 56 |
| 8 | 18.2 mm | 57 |
| 8.5 | 18.6 mm | 58 |
| 9 | 19.0 mm | 60 |
| 9.5 | 19.4 mm | 61 |
| 10 | 19.8 mm | 62 |
| 10.5 | 20.2 mm | 64 |
| 11 | 20.6 mm | 65 |
| 11.5 | 21.0 mm | 66 |
| 12 | 21.4 mm | 67 |
| 12.5 | 21.8 mm | 69 |
| 13 | 22.2 mm | 70 |
| 13.5 | 22.6 mm | 71 |
Need a custom size? Chat With Us
Still not sure about your ring size? Use our printable ring sizing chart and a ring that fits you. Follow the instructions on the page to find your correct size.
Kommentar